Links from 2026-06-17

The LLMentalist Effect: how chat-based Large Language Models replicate the mechanisms of a psychic’s con

One of the issues in during this research—one that has perplexed me—has been that many people are convinced that language models, or specifically chat-based language models, are intelligent.

…

LLMs are not brains and do not meaningfully share any of the mechanisms that animals or people use to reason or think.

LLMs are a mathematical model of language tokens. You give a LLM text, and it will give you a mathematically plausible response to that text.

There is no reason to believe that it thinks or reasons—indeed, every AI researcher and vendor to date has repeatedly emphasised that these models don’t think.

…

Many of the proposed use cases now look like borderline fraudulent pseudoscience to me.

The intelligence illusion seems to be based on the same mechanism as that of a psychic’s con, often called cold reading. It looks like an accidental automation of the same basic tactic.

By using validation statements, such as sentences that use the Forer effect, the chatbot and the psychic both give the impression of being able to make extremely specific answers, but those answers are in fact statistically generic.

Tagged as: ai, collection, delicious, ki, links, shaarli | Author: Martin Leyrer
[Donnerstag, 20260618, 05:00 | permanent link | 0 Kommentar(e)

Name:	(required)
E-Mail:	(required, never published)
URL:	(not required, published)
Comments:
Select the checkbox, if you are a spam bot. Markiere das Optionsfeld, wenn Du ein spam bot bist.
Use a working email address, unless you want your comment to be removed.

Links from 2026-06-17

The LLMentalist Effect: how chat-based Large Language Models replicate the mechanisms of a psychic’s con

Disclaimer

Search

Me, Elsewhere

Tag Cloud

Blogroll

AFK Readinglist